What’s that old saying?
“If you can’t say anything nice, write a political ad?”
Actually, I’ve been silent for these lo weeks because I really didn’t have much nice or constructive to say about the upcoming election.
But as we’ve come closer to the day (Thank your deity here), it’s become clearer and clearer that the result of Tuesday will be … absolutely nothing.
It’s not going to matter who wins in the final votes. It doesn’t matter which controversial proposition is approved by voters. In the end, half of us will continue to distrust the other half, characterizing those on the right as “rich-only-in-it-for-themselves-pseudo-racists” and the folks on the left as “hippie-heal-the-world-wealth-distributing-socialists.”
And for all the hatred, lies, exaggerations and outright distractions, we’ll still be faced with the same problems we had before: No one willing to work with the other because they’re afraid of the consequences of being labeled a traitor to the cause.
Look at the hell Chris Christie caught this week as he praised the efforts of President Barack Obama in response to Hurricane Sandy. He didn’t do anything more than say that the President had come to the aid of his state, and was working to help. And yet, there’s Rupert Murdoch threatening him on Twitter that if Mitt Romney loses the election, it’ll be his fault.
Sigh.
This election has taken a heavy emotional toll on so many of us. It has been so negative. Nearly every ad – whether on my TV, on my radio or stuffed in my mailbox (and there’s been a lot of those) – is negative. Republicans attacking Democrats. Democrats attacking Republicans. Democrats attacking Democrats. Republicans attacking Republicans. No one wants to be seen as soft, so they attack, attack, attack.
And that’s not even counting the never-ending blitz of ads for California’s endless supply of propositions. Every one of them is predicting the end of the world if it is or is not passed.
My absolute favorite ones are the ones that are attacking the unions, and how they’re the cause of this mess. Yes, let’s blame the unions. The teachers, civil servants and workers who are just looking to get the most they can while they can … those people?
It’s funny, when a corporate CEO gets the most he can, including multi-million dollar parachute buyouts after failing; it’s just the cost of doing business. But the people who teach our students, make sure fires are put out and work to put food in the stores, they’re greedy for trying to protect their pensions.
Look, I understand the cynicism and anger toward Proposition 30 and federal health care reform. No one wants to see more of their money going to the government.
But the truth of the matter is, we’re already paying for much of these programs in different ways.
I think back to this past summer, and “Papa” John Schnatter claiming pizza prices would go up 14 cents to comply with the federal health care mandate that Romney wants to repeal. Fourteen whole cents for that kid making your pizza to get that cough or infected sore checked out? A bargain.
And how much are you already paying to help your child’s school. My son started school this year, and the fundraisers are non-stop. We have weekly smoothie drives, a jog-a-thon, donations sought to go on their first field trip (including a fee for me to drive myself to go volunteer at the event). Oh, and there’s the pressure from the school for students to make up absences by going to school on Saturday. Because the schools need to squeeze every penny of that average daily attendance funding.
Yeah, I know. I’m being flippant. These are serious issues that are going to affect generations to come, including my son. And I’m just another one of those Huff-Post-liberal-biased-media-member. Save your virtual breath.
In actuality, I’m just a beaten-down-half-shell of a man who’s tired of watching his country explode in a partisan battle of semantics.
So, go vote Tuesday. Maybe it’ll help this time. Not holding my breath.
Gregory Brittain 10:15 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 "It is almost a foregone conclusion that the Obama administration will bomb somebody in Libya this weekend, even if it is a herd of goats." That quote was from POLL: Who Won Round 3 Of The Presidential Debate? Did I miss it?
12:43 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012 "The primary reason for the 2008 recession was the Dems’ policy of forcing banks to make loans to people who could not afford to pay the loans back" Just how did they do this. Wasn't it Bush II who said that this should be a home ownership society?
It should be clear to everyone that Gregory Brittain is always right and will battle to the death to prove it. There’s no point in trying to fight him. If he can’t back something up with reality, he’ll make something up, just to show you how wrong you are. He is a never-give-up, never surrender troll with a dash of expert troll. It's clear he knows everything about everything and loves to share his knowledge. He’s a lawyer, an economist, a senator, a historian, a visionary. So please do the responsible thing and don't feed the troll.
“The decision by Fannie and Freddie to embrace no-doc lending in 2004 opened the floodgates of bad credit. In 2003, for example, total subprime and Alt-A mortgage originations were $395 billion. In 2004, they rose to $715 billion. By 2006, they were more than $1 trillion.” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903927204576574433454435452.html “I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing.” Barney Frank See “What They Said About Fan and Fred” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122290574391296381.html “Seventeen. That's how many times, according to this White House statement (hat tip Gateway Pundit), that the Bush administration has called for tighter regulation of the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/10/06/democrats-were-wrong-on-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac “Media Repeat Obama's Big Lie About Mortgage Crisis http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/041112-607389-new-evidence-shows-credit-quotas-caused-crisis.htm?p=full
How would the MSM cover Benghazi or the slow response to Hurricane Sandy if there was Rep president?
sandy? unemployment 8%...broken promise? "more flexibility" after election? debt... "it's for the kids" ....
Obama claimed he for developing America's energy resources. Then 2 days after the election, closed 1.6 million more acres to energy development. Why did he wait until after the election? resources.
“The nearby table lays out the ugly details. The feds rolled up another $1.1 trillion deficit for the year that ended September 30, which was the biggest deficit since World War II, except for each of the previous three years. President Obama can now proudly claim the four largest deficits in modern history. As a share of GDP, the deficit fell to 7% last year, which was still above any single year of the Reagan Presidency, or any other year since Truman worked in the Oval Office.” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323894704578113033115035920.html?mod=opinion_newsreel “Even if Mr. Obama were to bludgeon Republicans into giving him all of the tax-rate increases he wants, the Joint Tax Committee estimates this would yield only $82 billion a year in extra revenue. But if growth is slower as a result of the higher tax rates, then the revenue will be lower too. So after Mr. Obama has humiliated House Republicans and punished the affluent for the sheer joy of it, he would still have a deficit of $1 trillion.” BTW, the chart shows in fiscal 2007, the deficit was $161B, 1.2% of GDP. That was with two wars and the same tax rates as now. In fiscal 2008, the deficit was $459B, 3.2% of GDP. “I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine
Despite what it says in the Conservative bubble, it is not a law of nature (or economics) that raising taxes will decrease revenues. If you need proof, see the Clinton years. He raised taxes, had a budget with a surplus and had a booming economy. What did Bush do with that surplus? There are also some flaws in your analysis of fiscal 2007. First, taxes have been reduced under Obama. As a compromise to the Republicans, Obama included these tax cuts as a big part of the infamous stimulus package. Second, there is one proven thing that cuts revenue to the Federal government and that is a down economy. The economy really started crashing in late 2008.
Linda is correct when she wants a new environmental study, a 22 year old study is outdated. The builders plans are questionable look online at Addendum IV CEQA which is full of all kinds of inaccurate information. There is a golf course noted in the Multiple Species Habitat Land. I believe the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission is out of line giving a developer a 20 million dollar exemption. Look at all the changes they have made to the general plan in the last 20+ years. 20 million dollars would build a lot of roads and more in Lake Elsinore. I don't believe the people on the planning commission are that stupid, so what are they doing? Do things change depending on who asks for something from the Planning Commission. Please watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m_HypxyudI Look at the PDF which Toni added it tells you the story.
“Kathy Bostjancic, director of Macroeconomic Analysis for the Conference Board, said bluntly, ‘We're going to get downgraded.’” http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/09/State-Dept-Briefs-Foreign-Reporters-On-U-S-Economy-We-re-Going-To-Get-Downgraded
“Democratic leaders in the Assembly and Senate, where neither party has held a two-thirds majority in both chambers since 1933, say they don’t intend to use their new power to raise taxes. They say they want to change the code to bring in more revenue, such as by applying the sales tax to more services.” Let’s read that again. “They don’t intend to use their new power to raise taxes. They say they want to change the code to bring in more revenue, such as by applying the sales tax to more services.” But don’t worry, Brown promises prudence. http://www.newsmax.com/US/BBEXCLUDE-BGVTTOP-BIZNEWS-BLCPOLSTL/2012/11/12/id/463740
Holly Solomon, 28, was arrested after running over husband Daniel Solomon following a wild chase that left him pinned underneath the vehicle. Daniel Solomon, 36, was in critical condition at a local hospital, but is expected to survive, Gilbert police spokesman Sergeant Jesse Sanger said. Police said Daniel Solomon told them his wife became angry over his "lack of voter participation" in last Tuesday's presidential election and believed her family would face hardship as a result of Obama winning another term. Witnesses reported the argument broke out on Saturday morning in a parking lot and escalated. Mrs Solomon then chased her husband around the lot with the car, yelling at him as he tried to hide behind a light pole, police said. He was struck after attempting to flee to a nearby street. Obama won the national election with 332 electoral votes compared with 206 for Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Arizona's 11 electoral votes were won by Romney.
Jesus is king And with that I am going to have a beautiful day. You do the same Carol
12:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 "No matter who is president Jesus is king" Not of the United States. The Constitution guarantees us a separation of church and state. You should read it some time.
Jesus is King of Kings and Lord Of Lords, no matter who is president he will always be King, even if you don,t believe Carol. The US means nothing compared to eternity, how sad to be you.
2:07 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 "You don't understand Carol which is sad in a big way. Jesus is King of Kings and Lord Of Lords, no matter who is president he will always be King, even if you don,t believe Carol. The US means nothing compared to eternity, how sad to be you." I am glad that you are happy within your belief structure as I am happy with my lack of belief. Not sure how any of this fits into the discussion.