.

OP-ED: 'If Elected, Third District Candidate Ramos Faces Conflicts of Interest'

The following was submitted by Los Angeles attorney Robert J. Prata, a native of the Inland Empire.

There's a lot of talk about divided loyalties in San Bernardino County government, but one principle cuts through the rhetoric: Politicians must be completely loyal to their constituents. Indeed, California law requires our elected representatives to put the interests of the people they serve ahead of their own. When they fail to do so, they risk losing office and even going to jail.

James Ramos, a candidate for County Supervisor, has promised voters that he will not let conflicts interfere with his representation of the citizens of San Bernardino County. Announcing his candidacy, Mr. Ramos complained that "public faith in our institutions" was undermined by politicians "being forced to recuse themselves from important duties and votes due to legal problems." His problem in making his promise to voters will be keeping it: If elected, Mr. Ramos will hardly be able to avoid the massive conflict of interest created by the County's numerous contracts with his San Manuel Band of Mission Indians.

For years, as a member and then as Chairman of the San Manuel tribe, Mr. Ramos received millions in casino profits. It has been reported that Mr. Ramos still receives up to $100,000 monthly from the tribe. What's more, Indian tribes with gambling interests have bankrolled Mr. Ramos's election bid, including a $25,000 check from Mr. Ramos's San Manuel tribe, now run by Mr. Ramos's aunt. That does not even count thousands of dollars indirectly donated through political action committees and other hard-to-trace sources.

Mr. Ramos is working hard to avoid this apparent conflict by hiding the extent of these connections. Despite numerous requests from various sources for Mr. Ramos to fully disclose the magnitude of his ties to the San Manuel tribe - including his per capita income distribution, salary, or his ownership interest in its economic concerns - Mr. Ramos refuses to do so.

Why are Mr. Ramos's financial ties to the San Manuel tribe and its casino important? Every year, the Board of Supervisors negotiates contracts with San Manuel worth millions of dollars - contracts for a variety of services critical to the success of the tribe and its casino operations, including law enforcement, fire protection, infrastructure support, and the like, all of which directly impact casino operations. Given that San Manuel casino profits are a primary source of Mr. Ramos’s income, these contracts create an obvious conflict of interest under California law. California Government Code Section 1090 provides that elected representatives "shall not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity," and it makes it a felony to willfully violate these provisions. Mr. Ramos's participation in approving these contracts as a County Supervisor would constitute the same legal conflict of interest for which he has criticized others.

Sadly for San Bernardino County, this glaring conflict of interest is being ignored. Indeed, District Attorney Michael Ramos - another political beneficiary of casino-generated campaign funds - has closed his eyes and endorsed Mr. Ramos despite these obvious conflicts. With election about a week away, James Ramos must come clean with voters regarding his plans to address the conflicts that await if he is elected. Otherwise, he will be just another politician hampered by legal problems and, to use his words, "forced to recuse himself from important duties and votes" - precisely what he claims that San Bernardino County doesn't need.

Edmund Burke once said that "hypocrisy can afford to be magnificent in its promises; for never intending to go beyond promises, it costs nothing." Mr. Ramos' conflicts of interest raise crucial questions regarding his ability to represent and protect the interests of San Bernardino County citizens by seeking this position. Those are questions he must answer before, not after, election day, lest he become just another purveyor of broken promises.

Robert J. Prata is a native of the Inland Empire and a founding partner of the law firm of Prata & Daley, LLP, in Los Angeles.

Follow Redlands-Loma Linda Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here.

MANUEL J ARMENDAREZ SR November 01, 2012 at 12:09 AM
MR. PRATA AS A NATIVE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE, WHY WOULD NOT BE A FOUNDING PARTNER OF A LAW FIRM HERE IN YOUR INLAND EMPIRE ?? WHAT IS THE METHOD OF YOUR ATTACK AT SOMEONE THAT HAS IN PAST DONATED ALOT OF HIS TIME FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THE INLAND EMPIRE. YOUR SO CALLED STATEMENT OF BEING A NATIVE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE... FROM MANUEL J ARMENDAREZ SR.
Diego Jones November 01, 2012 at 12:18 AM
Ramos is a good man but he comes with a lot of baggage that will have to be unpacked carefully on land use, fees, and development issues. Given the County's track record of corruption, I would normally welcome an incumbent. But this one is a head-scratcher.
Gregory Brittain November 01, 2012 at 01:07 AM
Mr. Ramos and the San Manuels have been generous with their charitable contributions. However, that does not mean Mr. Ramos should be a county supervisor. Please see http://www.sbsun.com/pointofview/ci_21887746/ramos-turned-tax-free-dollars-into-political-empire In addition, since Mr. Ramos lives on the reservation, he does not have to pay CA income or sales tax (unless he purchases items in CA and off the reservation) nor property taxes. Electing Mr. Ramos as San Bernardino County Supervisor is like electing someone who lives in AZ or Riverside County as a SB County Supervisor. Mr. Ramos is a liberal Dem. Please consider whether you like how the Dems are governing CA before electing another one.
James Gale November 01, 2012 at 07:02 PM
If this story is true about Mr. Ramos, there will definitely be a conflict of interest, and therefore he clearly should not be elected as County Supervisor. I would like to know about the other candidates running for the same office.
Steve Rogers November 03, 2012 at 01:59 AM
The Ramos Bros., DA Mikey and Chief Rames, are trying to steal this election from the good 3rd District residents and voters. How quickly everyone forgets that our District Attorney is the master of selective prosecution of the laws of the land. He goes after Supervisor Derry for accepting a $5K campaign contribution through a PAC, while the District Attorney himself, Mikey "The Pimp" Ramos, failed to report $10K on campaign cash that he gave his wife in an off-election year for "services rendered". Being one of those entitled to be a member of the Redlands Good Olde Boyz club, hanging with DA Mikey and former-Supervisor Dennis Hansburgerler for drinks at the Tartan, payed for with all that Ca$ino Ca$h coming from the San Manuel Tribe, Chief Ramos has already "paid his dues" (and made a deal with the Devilreaux) to be our next Supervisor... isn't that called "pay to play" aka quid pro quo which is SOP for San Bernardino County government!?
Jesus Follower November 03, 2012 at 05:33 AM
Greg would rather elect a criminal, Neil Derry to the office. Greg, you have no ethics, morals or good values.
nick November 03, 2012 at 04:16 PM
Jesus Follower: You would vote for a man who receives all his income ripping off seniors and other victims at his casino? Who has "no values."

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »