.

Blueprint for 9/11 Truth

 ,   Add to calendar
 125 W Vine St Redlands CA 92373  See map

Video production of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth featuring architect and speaker Richard Gage, AIA. Discussion will follow to be moderated by Stephen Kemp, engineer and educator. We are planning for a meeting of no more than 90 minutes with the video shown in its 30-minute version. Please come with your questions to the Assembly Room in Redlands' historic AK Smiley Public Library and we will attempt to answer them.

Albury Smith February 06, 2012 at 11:01 PM
When did I claim to be "uncomfortable" with the page you've now plugged ~3 dozen times on here, Danny? As I recall, I've agreed with what little it actually has to say, and if I don't keep talking about it, I'm accused of being too technical and "leaving our readers confused again." You're clearly using it to avoid any substantive discussion, just as Steven Kemp did by quickly running away from his own article as soon as the dishonest and absurd claims of his ae911"truth" organization were exposed for what they really are, i.e. nothing more than a colossal array of junk science and ignorance, promoted by incompetent charlatans. As I've said before, if you or our "engineer and educator" ever get serious about discussing this matter intelligently, I'll see it in my new emails.
Daniel Noel February 22, 2012 at 06:36 AM
You have agreed with www.911babystep.com? Good! Keep reviewing it until you are comfortable with it. Then you'll be able to tackle the 9/11 fundamentals. In the meantime, this is as intelligent as a 9/11 discussion as you are ready for. Love,
Albury Smith February 22, 2012 at 06:41 PM
Why don't you enlighten all of those NIST engineers with doctorates and PE certification, Danny? They might even reciprocate by showing you what a "highly intriguing epistemological conundrUUUUUUUUUUMMMM!" is, if you play your cards right. :-)
Daniel Noel February 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM
I do work with NIST on 9/11, but that is material for the advanced class of the 9/11 essentials, which you are not ready for. Keep finding your way through www.911babystep.com. Love,
Albury Smith February 23, 2012 at 01:31 AM
You and Kemp aren't ready for much of anything, Danny, or you wouldn't run and hide as soon as your crap is challenged. My December 29 comments on Box Boy's obvious dishonesty are still here if you ever decide to discuss them. NIST doesn't need people as confused about the WTC collapses as you claim to be, unless they're cleaning up the offices and taking the coffee and lunch orders.
Daniel Noel February 23, 2012 at 01:35 AM
To repeat, as long as you are uncomfortable with the elementary www.911babystep.com, engaging you in anything more involved is a waste of energy. Love,
Albury Smith February 23, 2012 at 12:24 PM
My December 29 comments on Box Boy's obvious dishonesty are still here if you ever feel like addressing them, Danny, instead of hiding behind the vacuous drivel you've now linked to ~40 times on here. A "baby step" would be providing a plausible motive and perp for your controlled demolition hallucinations, and you can't even do that. Trying to discuss anything technical with you or the "engineer and educator" is obviously a waste of time. You both seem very content in your ignorance, although Kemp doesn't admit he's confused; he just runs away.
Daniel Noel February 24, 2012 at 05:11 AM
I have addressed all your comments, including the webs they linked to. To repeat, nothing in that information appears to demonstrate any element of www.911babystep.com to be false. I am not hiding behind anything. I just try to keep our dialog at your level. As long as you are uncomfortable with the elementary www.911babystep.com, in is a grave error to try to educate you on some more complex 9/11 concepts. Love,
Albury Smith February 24, 2012 at 01:50 PM
The NIST engineers should show you what a "highly intriguing epistemological conundrUUUUUUUUUUMMMM!" is, Danny Boy. Some noogies might help too. You're just adorable...
Daniel Noel February 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM
I don't need help to understand www.911babystep.com, thank you. But if you think some experts--NIST engineers or others--could help you, by all means use their services. Maybe they can unstuck you from the elementary conspiracy class. Love,
Albury Smith February 25, 2012 at 01:36 AM
The NIST engineers have been very helpful in explaining the WTC collapses, Danny, so I'd recommend reading their reports at your earliest convenience. The expression of hapless confusion and waste of bandwidth that you've now linked to ~40 times here would be greatly helped by a better understanding the findings of top SEs who've studied the topic. You might even be able to contribute something to the discussion yourself, something you've failed to do so far.
Daniel Noel February 25, 2012 at 02:41 AM
The details of NIST's work are much too advanced reading for somebody who is struggling with the elementary www.911babystep.com. www.911babystep.com is not that difficult to master. Keep trying. Love,
Albury Smith February 25, 2012 at 12:57 PM
They're way too advanced for you and your "engineer and educator," apparently.
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 12:00 AM
www.911babystep.com, too advanced for me? You are hardly qualified to make this determination, as your understanding of it is partial at best. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 12:03 AM
Your most recent foolish comment was "The details of NIST's work are much too advanced reading for [me]," Danny Boy. Try to keep up, huh?
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 12:40 AM
The details of NIST's reports on the three 9/11 WTC skyscraper disintegrations, too advanced for you? Absolutely! Stick to www.911babystep.com for the time being. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 01:24 AM
I think a "highly intriguing epistemological conundrUUUuuuUUUuuuUUUuuuUUUuuuMMMM!" may be in order for you, Danny Boy. The NIST guys get a good grip on your drawers and give you multiple wedgies in rapid succession. You're just precious. :-)
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 01:27 AM
You excel at insulting, but are stuck in the elementary www.911babystep.com class. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 01:38 AM
You excel at avoiding substantive discussion, Danny Boy, as does our "engineer and educator." Are you what's left of the 9/11 "truth movement"? Good grief...
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 01:41 AM
Me, avoiding substantive discussion? I have been exhorting you for weeks to get a grasp on www.911babystep.com, so you can start your own substantive progress into the 9/11 fundamentals. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 01:49 AM
You need to get a grasp on a "highly intriguing epistemological conundrUUUuuuUUUuuuUUUuuuUUUuuuMMMM!," Danny Boy.
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 01:51 AM
You excel at insulting, but you are still stuck in the elementary www.911babystep.com. Try harder. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 02:05 AM
Those NIST guys are gonna have to give you some noogies too, Danny Boy. Gaithersburg beckons.
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 02:07 AM
You excel at insulting, but you are still stuck in the elementary www.911babystep.com. Try harder. Love,
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 02:08 AM
Bye.
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 02:11 AM
Keep trying. Once you fully digest www.911babystep.com, you'll open exciting new vistas for exploration. Love,
Albury Smith Gormless Shill February 26, 2012 at 02:18 AM
albury smith is a lying gormless shill to see him ply his trade and get his butt kicked all over the internet, just google "albury smith 911" for most, simply watching those buildings explode is more than enough evidence - that some can still hold doubts means that they havnt given the events the slightest scrutiny, willfull ignorance based on fear of the truth perhaps. for others like albury, lying 24/7 all over the internet is just part of his job.
Albury Smith February 26, 2012 at 12:09 PM
Box Boy's job is conning gullible people like you, my little ASGS stalker. I just counter his nonsense with facts: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC_Not_A_Demolition What, pray tell, have I lied about?
Daniel Noel February 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM
Smith, lying? Perish the thought. An ignorant, by definition, is not a liar. If he was able to comprehend the elementary www.911babystep.com and kept peddling his nonsense, it would be another matter. Love,
shill stalker March 24, 2012 at 03:43 AM
a quick google for albury smith 911 will show a history of his commenting on every blog concerning 911, posting the same lies, distortions and obfuscations ad nauseam, 24/7 . the only people who would argue against a transparent, unfettered independent investigation into the events of 911 are those with a vested interest in supressing the truth. frankly, to hope that albury would voluntarily disclose such things as his real name and qualifications, to add just the slightest credence to anything he says, is as likely as there will ever be credible proof beyond all reasonable doubt that bin laden was killed in may of 2011. ie; NONE there is irefutable evidence that the events of 911 did not happen as we are being told, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jazdG3-ZETM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iND-b8Q3jc allblurrys arguments are so pathetic, if it wasnt for the fact that on the backs of the lies of that fateful day, hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children have been killed, civil and constitutional rights have been shredded, and the world has been subjected to a never ending war of terror, it would be funny. This video puts to rest ALL of alburys arguments and shows exactly why 911 needs a proper investigation. Professor Daniele Ganser (Switzerland) - 10 Years After 9/11 The Official Account Does Not Add Up http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fUT7XgLiTY

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »